news details |
|
|
| Significant Shift | | | The recent decision by the Centre to scrap the ‘no-detention policy’ for classes 5 and 8 in schools governed by it marks a significant shift in the education system.
This policy change comes after the amendment to the Right to Education (RTE) Act in 2019, which allowed states to reintroduce examinations and detentions at specific grade levels.
Notably, at least 16 states and two Union Territories have already moved away from the no-detention framework, reflecting a growing consensus about its limitations.
The ‘no-detention policy,’ introduced under the RTE Act in 2009, aimed to ensure universal education by promoting students automatically up to class 8, regardless of academic performance.
While the policy sought to prevent the stigmatization and dropout of students due to failure, it inadvertently diluted academic rigor and accountability in the classroom.
Teachers and parents have long raised concerns about students advancing through grades without mastering fundamental skills, leading to severe learning gaps and inadequate preparedness for higher education and employment.
The recent notification brings in a balanced approach. According to the revised framework, students who fail to meet promotion criteria in year-end examinations will receive additional instruction and a chance to reappear within two months. If they fail again, they will be retained in the same grade. This dual chance mechanism not only emphasizes academic accountability but also provides an opportunity for remediation, reducing the harshness of outright failure.
This policy shift underscores the need for a robust assessment system. Rather than relying solely on high-stakes year-end exams, schools must implement continuous and comprehensive evaluation (CCE) methods that monitor progress throughout the year.
Such assessments can identify learning gaps early and enable timely interventions. Moreover, teacher accountability and curriculum alignment are pivotal. Teachers must be equipped to deliver quality instruction, and the curriculum must cater to diverse learning needs rather than adhering to a one-size-fits-all approach.
The policy change also raises questions about equity. Students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds often lack access to supplementary resources like private tuition or digital learning tools. The government must ensure that remedial education is accessible, inclusive, and effective, particularly in rural and under-resourced schools.
While the scrapping of the ‘no-detention policy’ is a step toward reinforcing academic standards, it cannot be a standalone solution. It must be accompanied by systemic reforms addressing infrastructure, teacher training, and parental engagement. Education is not just about passing or failing; it is about equipping children with the skills and confidence to navigate the complexities of life. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
