| Wedding procession, rituals and changing society | | | Dr. Priyanka Saurabh
There was a time when the arrival of a wedding procession wasn’t just a celebration of one family visiting another, but a celebration for the entire village. Homes and courtyards were decorated, feasts were set up, songs were sung, elders offered blessings, and hospitality was considered a matter of honor. Today, in many places, that same wedding procession has become so confined to the time clock that the entire event seems to be transformed into a “go quickly, eat quickly, hand over the envelope, and return quickly.”
This shift isn’t just about food or ceremony style; it signals a transformation in social relationships, collectivism, and the very essence of Indian wedding culture. Marriage used to be a long-term social process, forging relationships, bonding neighborhoods, and passing down values from generation to generation. Now, many weddings are confined to one-day events, held in hotels or guest houses, and with limited formalities, reducing the scope of tradition to a mere ritual.
Indian marriage has never been a private arrangement between two individuals; it has always been a shared event of family, community, and culture. In rural society, the wedding procession meant an open welcome for guests, a community meal, folk songs, laughter, and a public display of the dignity of relationships. The food served in a row, the groom’s traditional attire, the in-laws’ turban, the temporary decorations in the courtyard of the house, and the overnight stay—all these made marriage a sacrament, not a simple ceremony.
Within this social structure, honoring a guest, hosting them, caring for them, and sharing a sense of belonging was considered a moral duty. The wedding party wasn’t just visitors who brought food; they represented the arrival of a new relationship. Therefore, their welcome was as intimate and elaborate as the meaning of marriage itself. This is why older people, looking at today’s hurried weddings, often say, “There’s no wedding anymore, only the ceremony.” This sentiment conceals not just a complaint but also a cultural truth.
Times have changed, lifestyles have evolved, and weddings have been impacted. Urbanization, inflation, professional life, limited leisure time, transportation, and new planning facilities have made weddings smaller and more manageable. Many families today prefer to manage everything in a short time rather than a grand event, so as not to overwhelm guests and reduce the financial pressure on the host. This is a practical approach, but it also loses some of the traditional intimacy.
Guest houses, banquet halls, catering, and fixed time slots have made weddings more organized, but also more formal. Where guests used to stay, they now simply leave after a meal. Where rituals used to be accompanied by songs and group participation, DJs, photo sessions, and stage events have become the main attractions in many places. The liveliness of weddings remains, but their intimacy is diminishing.
The biggest pressure on weddings today is expense and showmanship. Many families are more concerned with “what people will say” than with values. The decorations, clothes, stage, menu, caravan, and social media image—all of this leaves the core message of marriage behind. Where once there was dignity in simplicity, now grandeur often appears hollow.
This trend isn’t just urban; its impact is visible in villages as well. Luxury cars replace palanquins, loud music replaces traditional songs, and meals at separate tables instead of group gatherings—these changes aren’t bad in themselves. The problem arises when convenience culture completely displaces ritual culture. Marriage then becomes a social spectacle rather than a sacred union. This is where modernity can become disruptive rather than useful.
In Indian tradition, marriage is not just a celebration, but a sacrament. Sanskar means an event that connects a person to moral, familial, and social life. When marriage is reduced to mere entertainment, food, and photographs, it transforms from a sacrament to a celebratory consumption. This sends a message to the new generation that the depth of relationships is more important than the grandeur of their celebration.
This is why today’s weddings often seem unfamiliar to the older generation. They say that while guests used to be part of the family, now they’re just a name on a list. Previously, weddings took time, allowing for the opportunity to understand and nurture relationships. Now, everything happens quickly, and with that haste, depth diminishes. If society begins to treat its rituals as mere formalities, they gradually become meaningless.
Still, it wouldn’t be right to completely dismiss this change. It’s neither possible nor always necessary to preserve every tradition as it is. Some changes are natural over time. The question isn’t whether marriage should remain the same; it’s whether we’re able to preserve the sense of belonging, dignity, and social sensitivity within it. A small yet intimate wedding; simple yet respectful; modern yet cultured—that would be a better balance.
Society must understand that the purpose of weddings is not merely a ritual, but rather to strengthen relationships, advance culture, and foster intergenerational communication. Children must see that marriage is a collective value, not merely an extravagant affair. The home, the courtyard, the feast, folk songs, blessings, and hospitality—these are not mere nostalgia, but living threads of social memory.
Therefore, the biggest challenge today is balancing weddings between modern convenience and traditional dignity. It’s not necessary for every wedding procession to last three days, as in the past, nor is it appropriate to rush through every ritual. Marriage shouldn’t be so brief that it feels like a mere ritual, nor should it be so ostentatious that it ceases to be a tradition. The key is that the wedding procession should not arrive with a full stomach, but should leave behind some warmth, some memories, and some humanity in the relationship.
In today’s world, this is the most difficult, yet most important, task—preserving the spirit of tradition while embracing modernity. Only when wedding guests are not just patrons of the meal but respected partners in the family can we say that our culture lives on even in changing times. |
|
