news details |
|
|
| No citizen should be discriminated for purpose of employment to any office: High Court | | |
Early Times Report
Jammu, Apr 22: A Division Bench of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court comprising Justice Sanjeev Kumar and Justice Rajesh Sekhri has observed that no citizen should be discriminated against for the purpose of employment to any office under the State or Union.
The Division Bench prohibited grounds of discrimination under Article 16(2) of the Constitution of India, inter alia, are religion, race, caste, place of birth and residence. The only exception that is carved out by clause (3) of Article 16 of the Constitution is in relation to requirement as to residence within a State or Union Territory prior to employment or appointment of a candidate to an office under the State or Union Territory or any local or other authority within such State or Union Territory etc. and this exception can be made only by law made by the Parliament prescribing such requirement as to residence.
The DB further observed that the Parliament has not made any such law prescribing any requirement as to residence within a State or Union Territory in regard to any class or classes of employment or appointment under the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir. That being the position, neither the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, nor the High Court can prescribe any such requirement as to residence in regard to any class or classes of employment or 23 appointment under it. Clause 3(A) of the Advertisement Notification (supra), therefore, flies on the face of clauses 1 and 2 of Article 16 of Constitution of India. Clause 3 (A) of the Advertisement Notification impugned in this petition is declared ultra vires the Constitution and, therefore, shall not be given effect to.
With these observations, Division Bench allowed the petition and direct respondent No.2 to declare the result of the petitioners and subject them to the process of interview. Since the petitioners, who have participated in the selection process pursuant to the interim directions passed by this Court are less than the posts of Junior Assistant earmarked/reserved for SC category, as such, it is expected that all the petitioners must have qualified the written test.
Be that as it may, let the candidature of the petitioners be considered ignoring their ineligibility in terms of clause 3(A) of the Advertisement Notification and the selection process for 18 posts of Junior Assistants earmarked for SC category in Kashmir Division be finalized within a period of two months. Needles to say that in case the petitioners or any of them make it to the selection, their appointments shall be retrospective from the date the candidates who had participated along with the petitioners herein have been appointed.
The retrospective appointment of the petitioners shall be notional and without any monetary benefits.
In another petition SWP No. 1960/2018, DB observed that in this petition, there is a dispute as to whether the petitioner has applied for the post of Junior Assistant Kashmir Division. It is the specific averment made by the petitioner that he had submitted his application form for the post of Junior Assistant both in Jammu Division as well as the Kashmir Division, whereas, in the reply affidavit filed by the High Court, this factual 24 assertion of the petitioner is denied.
It is submitted that the High Court has not received any application from the petitioner for the post in question in the Kashmir Division.
Without going into the aforesaid disputed question of fact, we leave it to the High Court to find out as to whether the petitioner has applied for the post of Junior Assistant in Kashmir Division either of his own or through the intervention of this Court and participated in the written test. Depending upon the enquiry, the High Court shall take a decision in light of the judgment passed in SWP No. 1753/2018.
This significant judgment was passed in a petition filed by Mulakh Raj & ors who are residents of and belong to Jammu Division. They all belong to the Scheduled Caste category and have applied for the posts in questions. As indicated above, in the Kashmir Division, 18 posts of Junior Assistant are earmarked for Scheduled Caste category.
The petitioners being possessed of eligibility prescribed in the Advertisement Notification (supra), submitted their application forms for the posts of Junior Assistants under Scheduled Caste category, but the same were not entertained by respondent No.2 on the ground that all the posts of Junior Assistant in the Divisional Cadre Kashmir were meant for the residents of Kashmir Division.
Feeling aggrieved, the petitioners came to this Court through the medium of several writ petitions. The said writ petitions were entertained by this Court and a direction was issued to the respondents to accept the application forms of the petitioners for the posts of Junior Assistant, making it clear that submission of application forms and participation in the written examination would be purely provisional in nature and would not create any equity in favour of the petitioners.
The said writ petitions were clubbed together and disposed of by this Court by a common judgment dated 28.11.2017 with the observation that the petitioners had neither brought on record the guidelines, nor had they challenged the validity of Rule 11 and Rule 12 of the Jammu and Kashmir Ministerial Staff of the Subordinate Courts (Recruitment and conditions of Services), Rules 2016 [„ the rules of 2016'].
The petitioners were, however, given liberty to challenge the validity of clause 3(A) of the Advertisement Notification in question as well as the Rule 11 and Rule 12 of the Rules of 2016.
It is in the exercise of that liberty granted by this Court, instant petitions have been filed wherein the petitioners have specifically challenged clause 3(A) of the Notification and have also thrown challenge to Rule 11, Rule 12 and Rule 19 of the Rules of 2016.
The petitioners have also prayed for quashing of the select list of Junior Assistants Kashmir Division, issued by respondent No.2 vide order dated 17.08.2017.
The petitioners have prayed for a writ of mandamus to the respondents to declare their result and on the basis of their performance in the selection process, appoint them against the posts reserved for Scheduled Caste category in Kashmir Division. (JNF) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
STOCK UPDATE |
|
|
 |
| BSE
Sensex |
 |
| NSE
Nifty |
|
|
| |
CRICKET UPDATE |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
