news details |
|
|
| Sovereignty First | | | While addressing a defence conclave in New Delhi, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh reaffirmed that India remains committed to peace and global stability and it will take all necessary measures to safeguard its security and strategic autonomy and sovereignty whenever threatened.
“India seeks global stability, but not at the cost of its strategic autonomy. We are firmly committed to protecting our security and strategic interests whenever they are challenged.” He maintained that there could be no meaningful dialogue with countries that promote terrorism against India. He stressed that nations using terrorism as an instrument of state policy or providing shelter to terrorists must be reminded that terrorism cannot serve as a strategic asset.
The Defence Minister’s assertion that India will take all necessary measures whenever its security and strategic interests are threatened conveys an important message. India’s approach is not based on confrontation for its own sake. Rather, it reflects the principle that dialogue, diplomacy and peaceful coexistence require a secure environment. A nation cannot be expected to remain passive when its citizens, territory or national interests face serious threats.
Terrorism presents perhaps the most difficult challenge to this principle. India has consistently maintained that terrorism cannot be justified by political objectives or used as an instrument of state policy. Singh’s statement that there can be no meaningful dialogue with countries that promote terrorism highlights the contradiction between advocating peace and simultaneously supporting violent groups.
The international community has witnessed the devastating consequences of terrorism. Its victims are not confined to any particular country, religion or region. Terror networks undermine democratic institutions, damage economies, create fear among civilians and destabilise entire regions. Providing safe havens, financial support or other forms of assistance to terrorist organisations only prolongs this danger. The message that terrorism cannot become a strategic asset is therefore important. Terrorism may create temporary disruption, but it cannot provide a sustainable foundation for national security or international influence. The long-term consequences of nurturing violent groups can also extend beyond borders and eventually threaten the very societies that tolerate or support them. At the same time, India’s emphasis on peace and global stability is significant. As its international responsibilities expand, India has an interest in a rules-based and stable global order. Economic development, investment, technological cooperation and regional connectivity all require an environment in which nations can pursue their interests without the constant threat of violence. For India, the principle is clear: dialogue remains valuable, cooperation remains desirable, but neither can come at the cost of national security, sovereignty or strategic autonomy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
