x

Like our Facebook Page

   
Early Times Newspaper Jammu, Leading Newspaper Jammu
 
Breaking News :   BJP launches J&K outreach drive targeting Cong over women’s bill | BJP will ensure justice: Amit Shah | Opposition conspired to derail Women’s Reservation Bill: Hardeep Puri | Will implement women’s reservation, no power can stop us: Rajnath | TMC ‘betrayed’ women: PM Modi | Infant drowns, mother, aunt rescued after slipping into Chenab River | 5-day Civil Defence mock drill cancelled in Poonch | Railways facilitate 60-tonne Vermicompost shipment to Anantnag | 18 injured as tempo overturns in Rajouri | LeT’s ‘Khargosh’ found in Saudi Arabia, used fake passport to run away | CBI to launch Chatbot to help people verify notices issued to them | Mortar shell found near IB | 6 drug peddlers arrested, over 3.7 kg narcotics seized | 2 US nationals detained at Srinagar Airport | Snowfall, rain bring down temperatures in Kashmir | Back Issues  
 
news details
Court rejects bail plea of accused booked under UAPA in terror case
8/1/2025 10:37:18 PM
Early Times Report

Jammu, Aug 1: The Division Bench of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court at Srinagar Comprising Justice Sanjeev Kumar and Justice Sanjay Parihar has dismissed the bail appeal of Zahoor Ahmad Mir, a 37-year-old resident of Sallar, Anantnag, who is facing trial under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) for allegedly aiding and abetting terrorists affiliated with the Hizbul Mujahideen. DB upheld the Special Judge’s decision dated November 8, 2024, denying Mir bail in connection with FIR No. 30/2022 registered at Police Station Pahalgam.
Mir is accused of providing logistics and shelter to militants and facilitating their movements. According to the prosecution, his disclosures led security forces to a militant hideout in the Hokard Forest, where three Hizbul Mujahideen operatives were killed during a search operation.
While the defense argued that Mir was falsely implicated and had been arrested a day before the encounter, the court found no credible evidence to support this claim. The bench noted that Mir’s alleged connections to other designated terrorists, including his cousin, further strengthened the prosecution's case.
The court emphasized that under Section 43-D of the UAPA, bail can be denied if a prima facie case exists. Citing Supreme Court precedents, the judges reiterated that in UAPA cases, the principle of “bail is the rule, jail is the exception” does not apply.
The court concluded that given the serious nature of the allegations and the fact that most witnesses are yet to be examined, Mir had not made out a case for bail. However, it left the door open for him to reapply should there be a change in circumstances during the course of the trial. (JNF)
  Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network  
  Comment on this Story  
 
 
 
Early Times Android App
STOCK UPDATE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Home About Us Top Stories Local News National News Sports News Opinion Editorial ET Cetra Advertise with Us ET E-paper
 
 
J&K RELATED WEBSITES
J&K Govt. Official website
Jammu Kashmir Tourism
JKTDC
Mata Vaishnodevi Shrine Board
Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Board
Shri Shiv Khori Shrine Board
UTILITY
Train Enquiry
IRCTC
Matavaishnodevi
BSNL
Jammu Kashmir Bank
State Bank of India
PUBLIC INTEREST
Passport Department
Income Tax Department
JK CAMPA
JK GAD
IT Education
Web Site Design Services
EDUCATION
Jammu University
Jammu University Results
JKBOSE
Kashmir University
IGNOU Jammu Center
SMVDU