x

Like our Facebook Page

   
Early Times Newspaper Jammu, Leading Newspaper Jammu
 
Breaking News :   Fact-finding report on J&K assembly polls debacle returns to haunt Cong leaders | Work towards fulfilling dream of modern India: LG Sinha urges people | Liquor, non-veg food prohibited around Vaishno Devi shrine | Police arrest 30 accused for passing sim cards to terrorists | LoP Sharma meets Amit Shah, discusses J&K Assembly’s budget session, other issues | Panel recommends security assessment of all Indian missions, posts | 31 Naxalites, 2 cops killed in Chhattisgarh encounter | Significant reduction in gold smuggling: CBIC Chief | Looking forward to witness future of aerospace sector: Rajnath | SC to hear NGO’s plea on Rohingya refugees today | No one can undermine role of farmers’ in India’s development journey: Vice-Prez | Pak intruder held along LoC | Grand Shobha Yatra Organized by Guru Ravi Dass Sabha | Grand Shobha Yatra Organized by Guru Ravi Dass Sabha | JKTJAC holds monthly meeting, demands resolution of teachers’ issues | Natrang Stages ‘Yamraaj Ka Nimantran’ in Sunday Theatre Series | Natrang Stages ‘Yamraaj Ka Nimantran’ in Sunday Theatre Series | Director Agriculture Jammu inspects developmental activities | Sant Nirankari Mission organises voluntarily blood donation camp | Bovine Smuggling Bid Foiled in Majalta, 5 Rescued | Commitment Beyond Maps | Back Issues  
 
news details
Ayodhya land dispute case: SC refuses to refer matter to larger bench
9/27/2018 2:51:25 PM

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to refer the Ayodhya land dispute case to a larger five-judge bench and said that all places of worship are equally important.

A three-judge bench comprising of Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice S Abdul Nazeer had a 2:1 deadlock with only Justice Nazeer saying that the matter should be referred to a larger bench. However, a majority ensures otherwise. "Mosques aren’t immune from acquisitions. Temples, mosques, churches are equally relevant. A place of particular significance for practising religion has a different place in law. Issues, in this case, are entirely different," observed Justice Bhushan, on behalf of himself and the CJI.

The majority opinion expressed by Justice Bhushan and CJI Misra clarified that the observations in paragraph 52 of Ismail Faruqi judgment that mosque was not an integral part of Islam have to be understood in the context of land acquisition proceedings. Ismail Faruqui had held that a religious place cannot claim immunity from compulsory acquisition, and the observations regarding mosque were made in that context.

Muslim groups had filed a bunch of pleas seeking reconsideration by a larger bench of the observations made by the apex court in a 1994 verdict which had said that a mosque is not integral to Islam. Muslim groups had argued that the "sweeping" observation of the apex court in the verdict needed to be reconsidered by a five-judge bench as "it had and will have a bearing" on the Babri Masjid-Ram Temple land dispute case.

On Thursday though, Supreme Court said that reading of namaz in a mosque is not integral to Islam and can be done anywhere.

Now, the decks are cleared for Supreme Court to begin hearing Ayodhya matter from October 29 of this year.
  Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network  
  Comment on this Story  
 
 
 
Early Times Android App
STOCK UPDATE
  
BSE Sensex
NSE Nifty
 
CRICKET UPDATE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Home About Us Top Stories Local News National News Sports News Opinion Editorial ET Cetra Advertise with Us ET E-paper
 
 
J&K RELATED WEBSITES
J&K Govt. Official website
Jammu Kashmir Tourism
JKTDC
Mata Vaishnodevi Shrine Board
Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Board
Shri Shiv Khori Shrine Board
UTILITY
Train Enquiry
IRCTC
Matavaishnodevi
BSNL
Jammu Kashmir Bank
State Bank of India
PUBLIC INTEREST
Passport Department
Income Tax Department
JK CAMPA
JK GAD
IT Education
Web Site Design Services
EDUCATION
Jammu University
Jammu University Results
JKBOSE
Kashmir University
IGNOU Jammu Center
SMVDU