Like our Facebook Page

news details

Govt removes cap on appointment of lawyers as SC judges 8/17/2016 11:10:12 PM Agencies new Delhi, Aug 17: The Government has acceded to some demands of the collegium including removing the cap on the number of jurists and lawyers who can be appointed to the Supreme Court as judges, even though it has hardened its stand on certain key clauses of a document which guides the process of appointments to the higher judiciary. Sources in the government said that in the revised draft of the memorandum of procedure (MoP) - a document which guides the appointment of judges to the apex court and the 24 high courts - the government has acceded to the demand that there should be no limit on the number of lawyers and jurists to be appointed as judges. In the draft MoP sent to Chief Justice of India T S Thakur in March, the government had referred to the issue of appointment of lawyers and jurists as judges of the SC. The March draft had said that "up to three" judges in the Supreme Court should to be appointed from among the eminent members of the Bar and distinguished jurists with proven track record in their respective fields. The collegium had felt that the cap should be removed and the government has agreed to the proposition. As the government and the judiciary are trying to finalise the MoP, the Supreme Court had on Friday observed that the justice delivery system is "collapsing" and sent out a stern message to the Centre over non-execution of the Collegium's decision to transfer and appoint chief justices and judges in high courts, saying it will not tolerate the "logjam" and intervene to make it accountable. A bench headed by Justice Thakur said, "We won't tolerate logjam in judges' appointment which is stifling its judicial work. We will fasten accountability". In the August 3 letter to the CJI, cleared at the highest level, the government has also agreed to seniority being be the main criteria for elevation. In the earlier draft, the government had insisted on merit-cum-seniority. In the revised draft, the government has, however, reiterated that it should have the power to reject any name recommended by the Collegium on grounds of "national security" and "public interest". In May, the Collegium had unanimously rejected the clause saying it amounted to interference in the functioning of the judiciary. While in the March draft, the government had refused to grant authority to the Collegium to send the same name again after it had been rejected, the new one says the government will inform the collegium about the reasons for rejecting its recommendation.   Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network     Comment on this Story

top stories of the day

Shame! Unrest terrifies PDP ministers, refuse to hoist tricolor MHA asks security agencies to scan bank accounts of separatists, others Governor Vohra to stay, Modi govt rejects Guv proposal rule BJP MP, MLC violate law during Tiranga rally The SHO who salutes MLA before setting to work Omar wants PM Modi to forget Balochs, focus on Kashmir Officials suspend him on Minister's instructions Cop makes fortunes from bovine smugglers, drug mafia Alleged case of DSP joining hands with 'accused' Higher grade accorded to MD Handicrafts withdrawn Years on, GMC&H admin fails to provide security to doctors to hide failure admin rusticates doctors, issues threats 9 yrs on Floriculture Director's office runs in rented building Govt admits its failure in filling vacancies in different Govt deptts CEO Pulwama's inaction hampers regularization of Contingent employees Killer kite thread scares Jammu as city swayed by Raksha bandhan festivities Alleged case of DSP joining hands with 'accused' A year on: Balakote shelling victims rue Govt apathy, no relief till date

STOCK UPDATE

BSE Sensex NSE Nifty

CRICKET UPDATE