Like our Facebook Page

news details

HC refuses to quash charges against evaluator in alleged Bank scam 9/28/2018 10:03:14 PM Early Times Report Jammu, Sept 28: In a petition filed by Nitin Kumar Tayal who is a approved property evaluator of certain Banks including SBI, seeking quashment the order of trial Court dated 15.11.2014 whereby charges under section120-B read with section 419/420/467/468/471 RPC have been framed against him. Justice Sanjay Kumar Gupta after hearing Adv Rajneesh Oswal for the petitioner whereas Adv Monika Kohli for the CBI observed that law is clear that these contradiction and exaggeration cannot be considered at the stage of framing of charges. It is not the case of petitioner that there is legal bar created in any law for framing of charges against him. In this way, there is enough material to frame the charge against the petitioner. While dismissing the petition, Justice Sanjay Kumar Gupta observed that there is enough material that accused-petitioner made gross overvaluation in respect of nonexistent properties in connivance with Mir brothers; these Mir brothers got fraudulently evaluation of building constructed on the land of one Krishan Singh and shown the value of land as Rs.1.84 crores and that of building as Rs.15.88 lacs with connivance of petitioner Nitin Tayal. It was also found that Nitin Tayal with connivance of Mir brothers made mis-representation thereby showing the land in the vicinity of National Highway (1-A), Moti Mahal Restaurant, J.P Guest House and Military Check Post, whereas it was 1 V KM far from National Highway. It has also come in investigation that land measuring 10 kanal each on the name of Major Singh and Thoru Ram under kh.no 1474 min situated at Chowadi, Jammu were not belonging to them; it has come during investigation that accused /petitioner showed evaluation of land as commercial cum residential with double storey building under kharsa no. 836 measuring 18 k 8 m situated at village Tringla Ramban, on the name of Mohd Iqbal Mir and Parvez Mir, as 1.84 crores of land and that of building as 15.88 lacs, but there was no building in existence and evaluation of land was done at exorbitant rate.   Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network     Comment on this Story

top stories of the day

SMVDU: A no-go area for people of Jammu Suspects found with intimidating material detained under 'istekhasa', intelligence agencies kept in dark Cong fighting civic bodies elections half-heartedly Ex-babu, Cong leader raise complex in Bathindi PNB declares former Minister and family as 'willful defaulters' This is what Ansari's will lose Naeem demands 'Glasnost' to dismember India 1-month-old neta ready to 'buy' Srinagar polls 21 lakh people in JK still wander without Adhaar cards Teachers stay away from Banjala Alert sounded across Central, South Kmr as SPO decamps with 7 rifles from residence of legislator in Srinagar 'First they should learn to respect their elders then dream Jammu mayor seat' Officials who failed to submit report to ADB may face action ED utilises services of untrained teachers in primary schools JK fails to implement economic reforms: Courtesy conflict Citizenship alone mitigate Pak refugees problems Ring Road affected farmers meet Advisor, CS Admission to 5 new medical colleges to start in June 2019 in 3 disciplines

STOCK UPDATE

BSE Sensex NSE Nifty

CRICKET UPDATE