news details |
|
|
| Ideological conflict between family rule and democracy | | | Er. Jitender Kohli
A series of conflicts around the globe are apparent, today, in the shape of bloodshed. Normally it looks like border encircling, to secure better defensive postures commanding settlements for once safety. It reflects both the conflicting is so patriotic to their respective countries and society, that they shall endanger rather scarify their life.
If analysis of these conflicts are done, peep in the past history of these countries, we find, it is not conflict of survival but differences in ideology making them to clash.
The Nations are defined with their geographical boundaries nourished with cultural existence, so Nation exist up-to which the cultural equality survives. These Nations are at present converted in to countries which are shaped with fixed border lines though both the countries are having same culture, language, living style and geographical components.
The European races and Muslims from Middle East invaded different sub-continents parts and fixed borders to govern over the locals. When their powers were withdrawn, they declared the bordered portions as independent countries. In-spite of every similarity, even families divided in two parts, one living on this and other on that side of the dividing line. These countries refused to turn in to one Nation. Vested interests created the hindrances.
The Indian sub-continent now consists of India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, Maldives, Myanmar (Brahma), Nepal and so on. All these have similarity of their culture, religious performances in one shape or the other and geographic formation, Himalaya with its wings such as Hindukush on one side, Hind sagar on the other side. Study "Mahabharata" you shall find family relations with Afghanistan. The queen "Gandhari" hailed from "Gandhar" now called "Kandhar".
Ramayana depicts movement from North to Lanka. Methodically, "Parvati Mata" as a virgin girl, performed meditation in south at "Kanya Kumari" for Lord Shiva who was at "Parvat Kailash" in the deep Himalaya in North. So Hindustan/Bharat now called India also has clear figure of its existence having similar culture, though languages varies. The invasions of the Muslims polluted this zone and Europeans further divided this Nation to different countries.
So Hindu speaking about "Hindutatv" is not aggressive as projected by Muslim media. Hindu when speaks for "Hindutatv" it speaks of unity among all the countries which have same culture. So "Hindutatv" means all the persons who love the said geographically chalked Nation by nature are one and "Hindu" is having connection with "Hindustan". They are free to perform their own set way of worship, in any form but must respect the entire land and people living there in.
Thus Hindu is a sober and accretive Hindu who thinks and speaks for betterment of everyone who lives in this sub-continent, so "Akhand Bharat" concept is to unite inhabitants of this sub-continent and not to damage any one. Numerous intellectuals have said about this fact, they believe it and stand for it.
Thus the present situation of the Jammu and Kashmir State is complicated due to un-adjustability, un-tolerance and un-adoptability attitude of a section of society of the Kashmir valley. This section of the society is exploiting religious sentiments of innocent people of Kashmir valley making them to isolate from the main National stream of living. This needs to be exposed to let the innocent people of valley to understand what the regional political parties of the valley doing for them. They must be aware of the losses they are bearing and the booty enjoyed by such leaders.
Entire Indian political centered at Delhi was planned, controlled, and operated by the Nehru-Gandhi family which has special inclination towards the Kashmir valley and its few people. This family is surrounded by the valley political leaders and officials who are watching their own vested interests, keeping the governing family half educated of the ground facts in the Jammu & Kashmir state. This is the basic complication resulted in the Kashmir problem to survive at the cost of entire Nation.
This family with collaboration of similar ideological families established dynastic rule in states under its command. It converted Indian National Congress as a commercial hub though Mahatma Gandhi had advised to disband this non-political party to form a political party. This family disobeyed Mahatma Gandhi and kept this title alive for its vested interests. Thus the democracy never properly functioned in this country.
These dynastic rules at different stage and time let the scandal after scandal to happen, polluted politics, mis-governing created bureaucracy to function on politicians will, the culprit of Bhopal gas, Boffors scandal and so on were assisted to escape, anti-national elements in the Kashmir valley let enjoy luxurious lives under state protection and at different places generate non-issues as issues to widen gap between society.
National society realized what the ruling politicians have done in the name of democracy and decided to change the dynastic family rulers to democratic system. The outgoing dynastic rulers have deepened their roots in the governing machinery and had established their puppets nearly in all the spheres. The non-issues in the name of religion, reservations and so on was cropped strengthened by planned alleged national intolerance from the returning of awards by the niece of Jawaharlal Nehru followed by those who were politically opposing the contestant Modi during that election. The fake intolerance issue is further exposed when the Honourable Chief Justice of the national Apex Court has told about the all time tolerant nation and rejected national intolerance alleged by a few.
Congress led UPA has practically damaged the entire prosperity program chalked by the present NDA government on flimsy grounds. To block the national development by the NDA government is aimed to prove its failure and restore the dynastic rulers.
Is it nationality or not one can judge from many such acts of congress led UPA among which the stopping of the Rajaysabha business on the fake allegation on one of the central Minister and ignoring those politicians who saw Pakistan support to topple the present Indian government.
The ideology conflict is clearly evident between the dynastic rulers and the democratic nationalist, so-called secular and the so-called communal, between the one who seek equal civil code in the nation and one who tooth and nail oppose it. The ideological conflict is between family rule system and democracy.
--(The author is a senior columnist, Ex- State Press & Publicity Secretary; VHP J&K State Unit can be contacted on -- [email protected]) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
STOCK UPDATE |
|
|
 |
| BSE
Sensex |
 |
| NSE
Nifty |
|
|
| |
CRICKET UPDATE |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
