Like our Facebook Page

news details

Govt denies permanent absorption of Sr Asst in Tourism, invites court wrath 12/24/2016 10:08:16 PM Avinash Azad Early Times Report Jammu, Dec 24: Quashing impugned order of state government that denied permanent absorption of a Senior Assistant in Tourism Department, the High Court has asked it to consider the case within three months. Hearing both sides, Justice Alok Aradhe observed: "The impugned order (was) passed in contravention of direction issued by this court in SWP number 249/2012. The impugned order is therefore quashed." Veena Goel, Senior Assistant with J&K Cooperative Wholesale Ltd, during her deputation with Surinsar-Mansar Development Authority in the Tourism Department, had sought her permanent absorption. Despite repeated recommendations made by the Chief Executive Officer of the Development Authority, the state government rejected the same. However, the petitioner approached the court by filling SWP number 2214/2009. The court while disposing of the case had directed competent authority to consider the petitioner's plea for her permanent absorption of her services within one month. The state government however challenged court's order and vide its order dated 4/7/2011 rejected the claim made by the petitioner for her absorption in Tourism Department. "Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in response to the query made by the petitioner under the Right to Information Act, the petitioner by a communication dated 15.07.2013 was informed that two specific guidelines/orders have been issued for absorption of services of the employees who are on deputation", the order read. However, on the other hand, Senior Additional Advocate General submitted that the petitioner is an employee of a cooperative store and not a government department and on account of personal difficulty expressed by the petitioner, she was sent on deputation. "The period of deputation was extended with the stipulation that the petitioner shall have no right to claim absorption. The petitioner was sent on the basis of her request on deputation in October 2005 and has superannuated in the year 2013 and the order of deputation contains a stipulation that the petitioner shall have no right to seek absorption", the Senior Additional Advocate General argued.   Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network     Comment on this Story

top stories of the day

BJP ministers maintain silence to keep Kashmiris happy Separatists have art of kicking up trouble over non-issues Bouquets to Wani family, brickbats for refugees J&K's Agri disaster is out, NITI puts J&K on 27th rank Delhi not interested in talking to separatists Demonetisation, mandatory Adhaar card hit 5.21 lakh pensioners in JK KPS officers suffer due to disparity in career progression scheme Bhim, Chib spar over guest house room 'Influential' medico eyeing post of Principal GMC Srinagar Khelo India: Finally JKSSC wakes up to hold competitions Govt not taking important issues seriously: HC Govt releases Rs 285.90 cr to clear MGNREGA liability Instead of SLWM focus is on lavatory construction? SKIMS run JVC hospital short of Para-medical staff, infrastructure Bant school cracks explode Govt claims about infrastructure Govt denies permanent absorption of Sr Asst in Tourism, invites court wrath Misappropriation: XEn exceeds limits while issuing technical sanctions GMC, NGO-CANKIDS gives cancer affected children special moments

STOCK UPDATE

BSE Sensex NSE Nifty

CRICKET UPDATE